Alternative Assessments - graphic with paths and direction signs pointing to alternate paths

Alternative Assessments: Assessing LEARNING, Not METHOD

The Alternative Assessment Model focuses our assessment design around content and learning objectives, with permission given to students to vary their method of response. This model gives students license to express what they have learned using methods chosen by them, rather than prescribed by their instructor.  

No votes yet

About

Module Link

This resource was originally developed with resources from the College STAR grant. That grant has ended and the College STAR modules will now permanently reside at the East Carolina University Office for Faculty Excellence.

Alternative Assessment Module Introduction

In academia we tend to have specific traditions related to how we assess students: writing assignments, lab reports, oral presentations, tests, etc. However, these assessment methods often require students to master the method of delivery even before getting to the content itself. For a term paper in a history class, for example, a student earns their grade in part based on their ability to write a well-formed paper – regardless of whether writing was an intended learning objective for the course.

The trouble with this approach is that students come to our courses from a variety of backgrounds and for a variety of purposes. While we can expect them to have a basic level of proficiency with the written word, for example, it is less likely that they will have mastered communication in the forms generally expected in a specific discipline. As a result, an instructor often needs to choose between spending time teaching students to write in the accepted format for their discipline, providing resources and expecting students to figure it out for themselves, or simply providing assignments and hoping for the best.

And the results are often less than pleasing. Students struggle to identify proper formats and approaches, graders get frustrated as they wade through an array of sub-par written work, and everyone wonders if the grades students are assigned really match up with the degree to which they have mastered the skills the instructor really wanted them to master in the first place.

One source of this problem is that we typically start our assessment design with a predetermined mode of response in mind. We begin, for example, with the idea that there should be some specific number of homework assignments, periodic tests or quizzes, presentations, written work, and so on – all layered in a certain way through the semester. We take care to build things in a worthwhile progression through the semester, even offering low and high stakes assignments with plenty of feedback to help students through. But what we forget is that each assignment mode carries with it a skill set that students must also master, in order to perform well.

One way around this problem is to focus our assessment design around content and learning objectives, with permission given to students to vary their method of response. Suppose for example I have asked my students to write a short reflection paper in response to a reading assignment. As an alternative, I might ask them to respond either in writing or through some other method, chosen by them. I can grade their responses according to a rubric that aligns with the learning objectives and goals for the assignment, while giving students the freedom to present their work in a form that suits their interests and capabilities.

This is the alternative assessment model: giving students license to express what they have learned using methods chosen by them, rather than prescribed by their instructor. The result is a situation where barriers related to the format of assessment are removed, and student grades are more likely to reflect levels of student mastery. Instructors can continue to hold students to high standards for content mastery, and students can bring increased effort and creativity to their work.

View full module

Support for this Module

Original development of this module was made possible by the College STAR (Supporting Transition Access and Retention) initiative.  College STAR was a grant-funded project focused on partnering postsecondary educational professionals and students to learn ways for helping postsecondary campuses become more welcoming of students with learning and attention differences. Much of this work was made possible by generous funding from the Oak Foundation.

Authors/Creators
Ruth Poproski

Organization/Publishers:

College STAR

Resource Quick Find
Professional Development

Resource File Type
Interactive module

Accessibility
WCAG v2.0 A

Share this resource:

Posted date:

November 21, 2022

Resource Fee
$0.00
Buy

tablet computer with the words, learning disabilities displayed

UDL and Students with Significant Cognitive Disabilities

This conference proceeding argues that Universal Design for Learning (UDL) is a framework that depends on the capacity of educators to apply the UDL principles to the widest range of learners.

No votes yet

About

This conference proceeding describes the work of the National Center and State Collaborative (NCSC) and how the resources developed by NCSC helps ensure that students with significant cognitive disabilities are included in the implementation of UDL and the Common Core State Standards.  In addition to developing alternative assessments, NCSC is developing curriculum and instructional resources and professional development modules using UDL principles. These resources and modules will be publicly available for use in any state regardless of whether the state is using the NCSC assessments.

Authors/Creators
Ricki Sabia, Angela Lee, and Rachel Quenemoen

Resource File Type
Document

Accessibility
WCAG v2.0 AA

Share this resource:

Posted date:

August 25, 2022

Access the full resource here if it does not render.

Resource Fee
$0.00
Buy

0
No votes yet

Hello, if a student has "no speech," they can't pronounce words. It should be clarified that perhaps, the word should be read to them along with a visual (pictorial representation).

If the student is visually impaired, you can't use an "image" to represent a word. A tactile object would be more appropriate. I feel that blind and deaf individuals should be separate in category.

I've worked with students who have multiple disabilities all in one-- blind, immobile and nonverbal. I've had to create lessons way outside the box to serve them. I've attended several UDL conferences to share my ideas.

The best curriculum that I've come across with regard to differentiation is called, "Unique," as the educator can tailor the curriculum to the specific needs of the students. This curriculum is most frequently incorporated in a special school, not public education, though it should be. It would help teachers who aren't exposed to working with individuals who have multiple disabilities, on how to tailor curriculum to individual needs, and is aligned with state standards. It also counts towards DLM testing, so the students don't have to take the DLM separately.

tablet computer with the words, learning disabilities displayed

UDL and Students with Significant Cognitive Disabilities

This conference proceeding argues that Universal Design for Learning (UDL) is a framework that depends on the capacity of educators to apply the UDL principles to the widest range of learners.

No votes yet

About

This conference proceeding describes the work of the National Center and State Collaborative (NCSC) and how the resources developed by NCSC helps ensure that students with significant cognitive disabilities are included in the implementation of UDL and the Common Core State Standards.  In addition to developing alternative assessments, NCSC is developing curriculum and instructional resources and professional development modules using UDL principles. These resources and modules will be publicly available for use in any state regardless of whether the state is using the NCSC assessments.

Authors/Creators
Ricki Sabia, Angela Lee, and Rachel Quenemoen

Resource File Type
Document

Accessibility
WCAG v2.0 AA

Share this resource:

Posted date:

August 25, 2022

Access the full resource here if it does not render.

Resource Fee
$0.00
Buy

0
No votes yet

Hello, if a student has "no speech," they can't pronounce words. It should be clarified that perhaps, the word should be read to them along with a visual (pictorial representation).

If the student is visually impaired, you can't use an "image" to represent a word. A tactile object would be more appropriate. I feel that blind and deaf individuals should be separate in category.

I've worked with students who have multiple disabilities all in one-- blind, immobile and nonverbal. I've had to create lessons way outside the box to serve them. I've attended several UDL conferences to share my ideas.

The best curriculum that I've come across with regard to differentiation is called, "Unique," as the educator can tailor the curriculum to the specific needs of the students. This curriculum is most frequently incorporated in a special school, not public education, though it should be. It would help teachers who aren't exposed to working with individuals who have multiple disabilities, on how to tailor curriculum to individual needs, and is aligned with state standards. It also counts towards DLM testing, so the students don't have to take the DLM separately.

tablet computer with the words, learning disabilities displayed

UDL and Students with Significant Cognitive Disabilities

This conference proceeding argues that Universal Design for Learning (UDL) is a framework that depends on the capacity of educators to apply the UDL principles to the widest range of learners.

No votes yet

About

This conference proceeding describes the work of the National Center and State Collaborative (NCSC) and how the resources developed by NCSC helps ensure that students with significant cognitive disabilities are included in the implementation of UDL and the Common Core State Standards.  In addition to developing alternative assessments, NCSC is developing curriculum and instructional resources and professional development modules using UDL principles. These resources and modules will be publicly available for use in any state regardless of whether the state is using the NCSC assessments.

Authors/Creators
Ricki Sabia, Angela Lee, and Rachel Quenemoen

Resource File Type
Document

Accessibility
WCAG v2.0 AA

Share this resource:

Posted date:

August 25, 2022

Access the full resource here if it does not render.

Resource Fee
$0.00
Buy

0
No votes yet

Hello, if a student has "no speech," they can't pronounce words. It should be clarified that perhaps, the word should be read to them along with a visual (pictorial representation).

If the student is visually impaired, you can't use an "image" to represent a word. A tactile object would be more appropriate. I feel that blind and deaf individuals should be separate in category.

I've worked with students who have multiple disabilities all in one-- blind, immobile and nonverbal. I've had to create lessons way outside the box to serve them. I've attended several UDL conferences to share my ideas.

The best curriculum that I've come across with regard to differentiation is called, "Unique," as the educator can tailor the curriculum to the specific needs of the students. This curriculum is most frequently incorporated in a special school, not public education, though it should be. It would help teachers who aren't exposed to working with individuals who have multiple disabilities, on how to tailor curriculum to individual needs, and is aligned with state standards. It also counts towards DLM testing, so the students don't have to take the DLM separately.

tablet computer with the words, learning disabilities displayed

UDL and Students with Significant Cognitive Disabilities

This conference proceeding argues that Universal Design for Learning (UDL) is a framework that depends on the capacity of educators to apply the UDL principles to the widest range of learners.

No votes yet

About

This conference proceeding describes the work of the National Center and State Collaborative (NCSC) and how the resources developed by NCSC helps ensure that students with significant cognitive disabilities are included in the implementation of UDL and the Common Core State Standards.  In addition to developing alternative assessments, NCSC is developing curriculum and instructional resources and professional development modules using UDL principles. These resources and modules will be publicly available for use in any state regardless of whether the state is using the NCSC assessments.

Authors/Creators
Ricki Sabia, Angela Lee, and Rachel Quenemoen

Resource File Type
Document

Accessibility
WCAG v2.0 AA

Share this resource:

Posted date:

August 25, 2022

Access the full resource here if it does not render.

Resource Fee
$0.00
Buy

0
No votes yet

Hello, if a student has "no speech," they can't pronounce words. It should be clarified that perhaps, the word should be read to them along with a visual (pictorial representation).

If the student is visually impaired, you can't use an "image" to represent a word. A tactile object would be more appropriate. I feel that blind and deaf individuals should be separate in category.

I've worked with students who have multiple disabilities all in one-- blind, immobile and nonverbal. I've had to create lessons way outside the box to serve them. I've attended several UDL conferences to share my ideas.

The best curriculum that I've come across with regard to differentiation is called, "Unique," as the educator can tailor the curriculum to the specific needs of the students. This curriculum is most frequently incorporated in a special school, not public education, though it should be. It would help teachers who aren't exposed to working with individuals who have multiple disabilities, on how to tailor curriculum to individual needs, and is aligned with state standards. It also counts towards DLM testing, so the students don't have to take the DLM separately.